Hock Hochheim's 2006 Blog

HOCK'S DAILY BLOG

(...or as daily as possible)

 

"Read by thousands!"

 

30 July 2006: Around the Bend

I am off to ol' Mexico for a half-business, half-"vacationione" and I will be back for the August Blog page just as soon as the internet connections down there will let me connect. I have a whole slew of subjects lined up to pontificate and bloviate about. The blog page will start looking more and more like parts of the CQC Magazine with guest pieces etc....

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

<<<>>>

 

29 July 2006: THE STOPWATCH OF DEATH

By SEALE Academy Director Ron Borsch

Imagine an incident in your community where homicide/attempted homicide was being commit-ed on children, at the average rate of 2.3 per minute! As shocking as this may sound, it can and has occurred, twice in “Active Shooter” incidents, both school scenarios, one each in the USA, Columbine), and Germany. The “Stopwatch of Death” terminology gives both greater impact and another dimension to the death toll in these time-sensitive crimes.

Active shooter incidents have been occurring everywhere for years, but it was not until the in-cident at Columbine High School in Littleton Colorado, that law enforcement got a serious wake-up call on the penalties for failure to respond quickly. Possibly the biggest change for law en-

forcement was the idea that we could no longer wait for a part-time SWAT team, that first responders needed to both address the matter, and do it quickly. Aside from the fact that it often takes tragedy to get more training and equipment for officers, the new rapid response methods that began developing, were a good thing for law enforcement.

WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM THE AVAILABLE LITERATURE

Early on, trainers began to recognize that their first responder students needed more convincing so they could understand the different dynamics of a school active shooter scenario. What we learn from the literature, on less than a couple dozen incidents, is that the majority of active shooter incidents involve a single shooter. Only two incidents involved two shooters. No incid-ents had more than two shooters, (but that, of course, could change in the future). Juveniles are especially susceptible to copycat crimes, and as they get older, merging into the workforce, the active shooting can naturally erupt into workplace violence, (D. Grossman).

 

SOMETHING TO HANG YOUR HAT ON

The SEALE Regional Police Academy in Bedford, Ohio, innovated the instructional tool, the “ Stopwatch of Death ”. Its use seems to be a valuable teaching asset in illustrating the need for speed. It seemed that no one else in the business had bothered to crunch the figures of avail-able data. For example, in known school shootings, there were only four known times. While this is a very small database, nonetheless, knowing that the average active shooter time is probably less than fourteen minutes , gives the first responder student a handle on understanding the need for speed.

 

HALLWAYS LIKELY TO BE THE PRIMARY ENVIRONMENT

The shortest known active shooter school time was little more than nine minutes , when a tactical first responder with a rifle aborted it , in Red Lake Minnesota. The longest known time was twenty minutes, at Montreal University in Canada. Both stopwatch of death numbers, were 1.4 murders/attempted murders per minute. The stopwatch of death is an important factor in understanding that in a large building, such as a school, the contact team cannot possibly search every room, and that their primary environment , lacking visual, hearing, smell or other intelligence clues, (“ Sight-Sound-Smell-Intell ”), will be hallways . On the subject of sound, training experiments and homicide investigations have revealed that in the same building, it is possible to be unaware of active gunfire in the same building, due to ambient noise, baffling, Etc.

For the first responder, the shock of violating previous training by rapidly passing rooms they have not searched, the stopwatch of death, along with training information the passed rooms will be covered by the contact teams rear guard , (and will be followed-up by a separate Search & Rescue team ), assists in understanding these new, (to them), dynamic methods.

 

YOU MUST PREPARE YOUR MIND FOR WHERE YOUR BODY MAY HAVE TO GO

The stopwatch of death is part of the preparation of our minds, and on that note, a relevant in-cident comes to mind. One of my hero's and warrior models is Stacy Lim, LAPD, Stacy survived and won an off-duty gunfight, which began with her being chest-shot with a .357 Magnum, (a tennis ball size exit wound out her back). She won the gunfight by staying in the fight with a real warrior's focus, pure aggression, flawless pistolcraft, (both participants moving, Stacy hit with all four of her fired rounds), and by being physically fit. The remainder of the several gang-bang-er's fled in the face of aggression from a real warrior.

The gunman died, as did Stacy, (three times, once in the ambulance and twice on the operating table). The medical hero's involved, and Stacy's will to survive combined to enable her to return to full duty eight months later. I had the honor of shaking Stacy's hand in Ontario California at an ASLET, (American Society of Law Enforcement Trainers), seminar where she spoke. Her mess-age theme was “ YOU MUST PREPARE YOUR MIND FOR WHERE YOUR BODY MAY HAVE TO GO ”. Stacy's inspiring message seems especially appropriate for the role of the Tactical Fist Responder, and I show a video clip reenactment of her performance in our courses.

CONCLUSION

We conclude with an interesting story as to how the “Stopwatch of Death” got its name. Years ago, a couple of hours into a Tactical First Responder course at our academy, (and after a great deal of emphasis on facts and data supporting the need for speed to save lives had been given, via audiovisual, Lecture/Power-Point), I was astonished by a students comment: “ Ron, you are making a really big deal about speed here, it's not like someone has a stopwatch on us ”! Momentarily caught speechless, I had to bite my tongue to keep from saying something like …minds and parachutes work best when open, (where was his mind during the mental preparation portion of class?)….

My slow but spontaneous response was “Thanks, you have given me a terrific idea. I need to re-title a section of my Power-Point slides the STOPWATCH OF DEATH”! More than a mere catch-phrase, the “Stopwatch of Death” has proven to be a quite popular section of our Tactical First Responder course, and is being used with permission, by fellow trainers in a new national seminar program.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Ron Borsch is a commissioned Consultant-Trainer for the Bedford Ohio Police Dept where he is semi-retired after a 30 year career as a Patrol officer, Rangemaster, Active and Defensive Tactics Instructor, and SWAT operator. A hobby trainer since 1976, Ron manages and is the lead trainer at SEALE Regional Training Academy, (a seven community cooperative). His Tactical First Responder course has been the most popular course at the academy for over four years. Ron's ideas, tactics or techniques have appeared on police internet sites, law enforcement journals, and on an International seminar CD.

Please do not reprint this without Ron's permission!

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

<<<>>>

 

27 July 2006: The End of CQC Magazine

Its after midnight and I am still up writing. In another room, Jane is writing her new book, which she must finish QUICKLY as per New York agent's request. I too, must finish a book that is being shopped around New York (its a "pseudo"-western if you must know). I have a 3-book deal in the works and ideas for 8 more magazine articles and two martial books on crime and adrenaline. I have to squeeze the latest book in, in between two police magazine articles coming out soon, one in a journal in August. Long story short? We are both damn busy writing. And busy in general.

Longer story? The point? We can no longer do Close Quarter Combat Magazine. As many of you know, the newest internet issue is already way late. You know, the times have changed so. When I started the idea for the magazine in 2001, the world was not so close, so flash-fast and broadband blitzed. The internet was not so fast and furious. News on any subject was not a flash screen away. Searches are a breeze now on any subject now. A breeze. Tons of short videos, hundreds of thousands of them, are free at your fingertips in almost seconds. A viewer could be hypnotized for weeks on end by the free martial clips.

Its a two-fang, fandango. One fang, the service of CQC Magazine is no longer needed and we no longer have the time to work on it. Two, with all these internet advancements for the reader, I no longer need or care to amass the information, dig the research, organize the collection, sweat through the sorting, push the rendering, and ramrod the publication. We have been replaced by the search engines at your fingertips. Frankly, a great sense of relief has fallen over us.

The articles from the two internet issues we have finished will soon be moved over to the webpage article page. The news features? You can find them yourself in a minute with a simple search.

Buffalo Nickels? He will have his own webpage (via us) in January that will no doubt be a hoot. This blog here will cover some of the features not unlike the Magazine. So will the Talk Forum. Some of your entries in the talk forum are as good as any magazine article! Please keep it up. By next January we hope to have a brand, new look, webpage, user-friendly, smarter, etc. The Buff will have a humor page.

Actually this blog page will start to look more and more like CQC Magazine as the weeks and months go by. Consider this blog as the CQC Magazine incarnate. The word/title "Blog" may disappear into "Talking Points" (DAMN! Bill O'Reilly uses that already) so it may have a name change too.

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

<<<>>>

 

24 July 2006: The Wallet

It seems that it is hard to escape what is called Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome. It seems it manifests in many different ways. Can anyone truly escape it? With me, what's left that haunts me still? Is...a wallet.

Through the years, I have removed many wallets from the pockets and purses of dead people. People who have been blasted, decapitated in car wrecks, shot or stabbed. Some smothered in blood, or stinking, or crawling with maggots. Suicide victims, accident victims, murder victims and people who have just flat collapsed from natural causes.

You open the wallet and find the dead person's history. You find out who they were. Where they live. How they lived. You find out who you have to deliver the death message to. That difficult moment.

Sometimes when I open my wallet, I catch myself thinking about this act. All this comes to me, as if all this turmoil filters down into this one symbol - a wallet. I take out the money I need and I can't help but imagine an officer someday, later? Ten minutes later? Looking into my wallet, looking to discover who I am, and who call about my death, following the very routine I have had to do.

When this feeling comes over me? As I put the wallet back in my pocket, I think about the shortness of life. The tragedy. I can't help but wonder, who will be the next person to look in my wallet?

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

<<<>>>

 

21 July 2006: Pistol Retention - The Full Scope

The problem of pistol (and knife and stick) retention is usually not fully expressed. In the big picture, you have:

1) Storage Problems - when not wearing a pistol, where do you keep it? Car? Bedroom? Desk? Table top? Gym locker?

2) Carry Site - where and how do you carry your pistol?

3) Draw Process - what to do to keep your pistol from the enemy when you first grab it and draw it.

4) Presenting it - what can you do to keep your weapon when you present the weapon and threaten the opponent?

5) Shooting it - what can you do to keep your weapon when you pull it and start shooting?

6) Moving - what can you do to keep your weapon when you trip and/or fall, while in common sense combat motion?

7) Shot! - what can you do to keep your weapon after you have been shot and your body experiences the trauma of whatever caliber bullet that hits you?

Pistol retention is hardly just the little small scope wrestling match so commonly practiced at the holster or at the threat presentation. We try to cover all these issues in our Gun/Counter-Gun Course.

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

<<<>>>

 

20 July 2006: Boxing DVDs Under Way. A Report from Washington DC

I am pretty excited about this Boxing DVD set and I believe it will be 6 or more packed DVDs and covering just about everything about boxing there is. Old school boxing! The kind forgotten in this day and age of Thai-Bo style, health-kick boxing so popular today. Jim McCann, other boxers and I went from 8pm to 4am at Sugar Ray Leonard's Gym here. Tonight, even more.

 

Boxing Basics

Aggressive Mitt Drills

Defense Mitt Drills

Counter-Attack Mitt Drills

Offensive/Defensive man-to-man drills

Man to man Chain sparring drills

Boxing/Sparring

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

<<<>>>

 

19 July 2006: The Sights and Sounds of Adrenaline Continue...

Been reading some oral histories of military veterans lately. Their recollections are as sound as any clinical research, after all, these are the people interviewed and questionaired. Here's one quote from a US Army soldier Gary Vetrees, as recorded in the book, House to House: Playing the Enemy's Game in Saigon, 1968:

 

"During a firefight you went on autopilot. You just go blank and do

whatever needs to be done. Everything happens fast, but in slow motion."

Okay, Doc! How do we classify that remark in the textbooks studies? How does Gary put a checkmark on "slow time" slot, when it all happened so fast...yet slow...and fast?

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

 

<<<>>>

 

17 July 2006: Just a Heads Up on the Video Clips

Folks, do to a sudden, LARGE increase in internet activity and related fees, we had to take down the free video clip page. While it is somewhat popular, we are being charged for storage and some kind of broadband download fee when people download or watch them, which is "Internet Highway Robbery!" Remember the so-called Army Combatives video that is really a very good - "Intro to BJJ video?" Well, in one month 3,500 people downloaded it from my page and this cost near $2,000 in extra fees! That was May and I will be stung hard for June too. Then July! Can you imagine being charged that much for something free. Due to contract obligations and so forth, I simply HAVE TO PAY! So, ahhh, me screwed! And ahhh...you enjoy!

Anyway, with the advent of all these YouTube style webpages, there are hundreds of humorous, martial and crime videos out there for your entertainment.

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

 

<<<>>>

 

13 July 2006: One Size Coffin / Cookie-Cutter fits all

I got an email asking me what I mean by cookie-cutter martial arts. Any martial art. That is a system that makes you, no matter your size, shape, strengths,weaknesses, age or skill to perform and move like the system's titular head.

He kicks high? You must kick high.
He cartwheels? You must cartwheel.
He power punches? This is your main solution too.
He wears this? You must wear this.
He head butts? You must head butt.
He flinches? You must flinch.
He only vertical fist punches? You must too.
He shreds? You must shred.
He tackles and wrestles? You must tackle and wrestle.
He restricts your training in other systems? You stay nice and dumb.
He dictates. You must mindlessly follow.
He makes the cookie cutter? You must force yourself into his pattern.

Aren't most of these systems flexible, too?
No. It does seem that if they have a handicapped person? They will fudge on the requirements (and it often makes the evening news-why not!) but, that is as far as any improvisation and individual expression is allowed to grow and go.

Will they offer lip service/hot air on your freedom?
Yes. Maybe. Will they walk the talk. No. And then, some say right away, no- "you cannot train outside this system." It will "confuse" you. "Distract" you. This is where you hear the KISS method and Hick's Law tossed about incorrectly to keep you down and in their cookie-cutter.

"Isn't any training program a cookie cutter? Aren't you making cookies?"
It is very difficult challenge to set up any training standards and steer clear of this cookie-cutter problem. It must be woven carefully into a systems' doctrine. A doctrine must have freedom built right into it.

A baseball player learns how to swing a bat. Simple, huh? Ahhh-KISS and Hick's law at its best. "Just swing, dude!" "That is all a stupid SOB like you can do under stress!" But each hitter must develop a unique swing based on his abilities and potential to be successful. What size bat? Who is pitching and what? A good hitting coach knows a lot about this. Your unique swing must become your simple swing from muscle memory repetition. How sophisticated and educated is your system head, to even understand these issues and then implement them into doctrine?  Is he just a Thai Boxer? Just a soldier? Just a karate devotee? A college wrestler?

I have created a college-like system that tries to expose people to all the mainstays of striking, kicking and grappling with hands, sticks, knives and guns. But, your favorites and your final product is your selected end. It is the freestyle combat scenarios that YOU have to construct. Not me. That journey is your personal growth and knowledge. That is emphasized in how YOU construct your level 10 tests. I don't tell you how to execute each scenario! You do. Fighting first - Systems second, is a big SFC motto.

And of course, as this exposure and journey-steering is my job, so to it is our instructors' jobs to expose a variety of people with these common mainstays. The idea is EXPOSE people to fighting tactics, not IMPOSE ones on them. For many years now, I have said in seminars-

 

"I am here to inspire you, not confine you."

a) Pick some for themselves (with appropriate KISS-like and Hicks-style limitations.)
b) Learn all moves to be good instructors for all shapes, ages, sizes and strengths.

...and so it goes, and so it goes. A legacy of maximized training, not mental and physical restrictions.

It is getting better out there on the marketplace! These traditional, restrictive programs really are slowly shrinking and dying off the charts. Traditional is good for kids. Not good for adults. BUT, I fear I do see the similar problem now arise in newer programs!

- Everybody Shred! - Everybody Flinch! - Everybody tackle and wrestle!

Just because the instructor is younger and in a t-shirt, doesn't mean they aren't making the same silly, damn mistakes. 

One size does not fit all. Not even one coffin fits everyone.

 

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

 

<<<>>>

8 July 2006: The Great Equalizers

We all know that virtually all competitions from illegal matches, to the UFC, to high school and pro wrestling have weight, even age ranges to prevent the slaughter of a Hulk Hogan over a Pee Wee Herman, or a young turk versus an 75 year-old technical master.

 

But reality combat is not so parsed out by size and age. Generally speaking, there are a few close quarter combat equalizers-

- Guns

- Sticks and impact weapons

- Knife, scissors...i.e. edged weapons

- Sprays

- Tasers and Stun Guns

- Grab-able surrounding items...i.e. lamp, ash tray

And the skills to use them, otherwise they often can be overcome.

Equalizer strikes? What are the most effective, general martial moves that transcend, as much as possible, as many common situations as possible? An educated person must make a list for them. Not everyone can do, or start with - say - a judo hip throw or a karate board-breaking, power punch. Such, requires weight-tossing finesse or developed powerstrikes and are not universal solutions to all size and weight issues of an all enemies. (Think of Pee-Wee Herman hip-throwing or punching Hulk Hogan). Rather, hitting the eyes, neck, groin and ankles/top of the feet are great, general targets and must be prioritized.

Next, equalizers must be more mission specific and situational. You must assess what specific situations your clients will be in and what they will need.

This refers back to my old, simple SFC outline:

1) Strategy (over-all mission, needs and goals of your client)

2) Tactics (best general, generic moves)

3) Situational (what are the common situations of your client?)

4) Positional (what are the small details to consider?)

 

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

 

<<<>>>

 

6 July 2006: Hand, Stick, Knife and Gun Parallels: A Never-ending Challenge.

Another key to easier learning is to make as many "across the board" parallels as possible. This is a real challenge when you take on the hand, stick, knife and gun approach. Just think of the long list of just the basics that are unique to the hand, stick, knife an gun. It is hard to strike a balance between comprehensive and simple. But, If you make training parallels, you can trim this down. Many times (not all, but many) you can exchange the stick for the knife, and even the gun and exercise the same movements. Examples, footwork, some strikes and for an example here-blocking...

For example, the "on-the-combat-clock, blocking.

1) 12 or high block
2) 3 or your right block
3) 6 or low block
4) 9 or your left block
5) "Sweep" under the clock

Five fundamental"clock" movements than can deflect straight attacks and stop hooking attacks. And they can be be done-
1) One hand alone
2) Two hands together
3) Two hands split or zone
4) Stick saber grip
5) Stick reverse grip
6) Knife reverse grip
7) Knife saber grip
8) and with CQC gun arm at times too, too)
Standing, kneeling, sitting and on the ground

Presented solo it is 5 movement options times 8 differences...or 40 things to remember and do and practice! Whew! as I said, when you teach hand, stick, knife and gun, the basic list looks long and complicated) What shall we do about it? If taught it all in isolation, it makes for complication. Which has been my past experience as a student...

...In many karate and filipino systems I have been in, the organizers would create these elaborate katas to work these hand blocks or mix hand blocks in with strikes, or really whatever the fancy of the organizer. In Filipino moves, it seems there would be an excessive amounts of angles and steps to be memorized for MANY sets of training. And still! They would manage to miss parts of the clock!

Complicating things more, in all of the karate I've done, these hand blocks also included classical movements with the non-blocking hand in conjuntion - as we had to position the non-blocking hand usually on our hip, (which of course is the kiss of death and a causes laughable snickers with boxers, MMA and modern fighting systems). I too, simply cannot abide by it.

Unsafe moves inside kata, such as this one, is one of the true downsides of kata. This is also, terrible muscle memory when you try to make the transition to sticks, knives and guns. After thousands of kata repetitions, If you block with the empty hand, you will instinctively want to position the weapon hand in these classical positions too. Hand kata complicates mixed weapon reality training (as well as mixed hand system fighting. A fist on the hand for too much kata makes a boxer or MMA guy, or a barfighter a very happy man.)

Plus, in the old days, old ways and old systems, we never did any two-arm blocking that resembles the common startle/flinch reflex! Any reality blocking module should include that startle/flinch! When many karates were formed years ago, these physiological discoveries were not formulated yet! Sometimes "pure" translates to purely out-of-date!

A streamlined study of the tactics, its essence has to be made on your topic. Then you have to ask, void of all influences (Filipino, Japanese, Korean, whatever) what is the real bare skeleton of this?

Invariably, in an effort to list practical blocking-angle possibilities, I realized that the simple clock was very a comprehensive, parallel concept to make a hand, stick, knife and gun training parallel.

I can take that above list of 40 things and in some 15 or 20 minutes teach that to a group. Since we use the universal clock, everyone easily remembers it. So, while the list above looks long and complicated, it is quite comprehensive and the universal parallels make the list physically digestible, easy to learn and fairly unforgettable.

The never-ending challenge is to make hand, stick, knife and gun material work in parallel where possible, as simple, yet and comprehensive as possible. Quite a balancing act.

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

 

<<<>>>

 

 

2 July 2006: Numbers and Points-The Adrenalin Saga Continues...

Below is a common study, echoed over and over again by police trainers, and some military. This is easily taken at face value and one will therefore continue the echo, echo, echo....(In fact, the term "echo" is reproduced below and is in the actual text of the report.) But the echo shapes training doctrine and soon, the path and training may run askew. Lets take a look at it and then ask a few questions.

"In a study conducted by Dr. Alexis Artwohl (author of Deadly Force Encounters) between the years of 1994-1999, she interviewed 157 police officers that were involved in deadly force shootings. Dr. Artwohl's study revealed the following results specific to "perception" issues:

- 84% experienced diminished sound (auditory exclusion).

- 79% experienced tunnel vision (peripheral narrowing).

- 74% experienced "automatic pilot" with little or no conscious thought.

- 71% experienced visual clarity.

- 62% experienced slow motion time.

- 52% experienced memory loss for part of the event.

- 46% experienced memory loss for some of their own behavior.

- 39% experienced dissociation; sense of detachment or unreality.

- 26% experienced intrusive distracting thoughts.

- 21% experienced saw, heard, or experienced memory distortion.

- 17% experienced fast motion time.

- 07% experienced temporary paralysis.

Dr. Artwohl's research is also echoed by other researchers (Soloman and Horn 1986; Hoenig and Roland 1998; and Klinger 1998), who found the same "perception" issues."

Interesting numbers on sheer, face value. The message to the recruit and the vet is...prepare to experience these. Methods of preparation? Vary and this is where the rubber meets the road for most of us. Will we choose improper ways to prepare?

 

Reality-based instructors love to 'echo" this study in their adrenaline-based systems. But, in our steps to prepare we ask - are all of the above adrenaline issues? All Heart rate issues? Concentration issues? Some? Both? I do wonder if all participants questioned or "questionnaired" had an open discussion about the diverse effects and issues such as the ones brought forth in this blog the last few months, specifically:

Focused vision versus adrenaline vision loss? Note above that 71% experienced visual clarity, yet 79% experienced tunnel vision. What? Out of a possible 100% how do we get a total of 150%? What does this mean? They felt both in ine incident? Is this just semantic verbal responses placed arbitrarily in the researchers columns?

Focused hearing versus adrenaline hearing loss? 84% experienced diminished sound (auditory exclusion). Okay. Why? Because the shooter was concentrated/ Or overwhelmed by adrenaline?

Memory Loss.

52% experienced memory loss for part of the event? 46% experienced memory loss for some of their own behavior? 21% memory distortion. Does this mean the test results are skewed because 119% can't really remember well and answer the questions properly?

In the book, On Combat by Dave Grossman, the Artwohl study is said to have only 141 officers and over half the statistical percentages are different by several percentage points? Odd. Harmless? That echo didn't bounce so well.

When you put your ear into the air, take care what echo's you hear. Adrenaline based instructors may hear what they want to hear, but are they suffering tunnel hearing or focused hearing?

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

 

<<<>>>

 

 

1 July 2006: The Chicago Way

Malone: "You said you wanted to get Capone. Do you really wanna get him? You see what I'm saying is, what are you prepared to do?"

 

Eliot Ness: "Anything and everything in my power."

 

Malone: "And THEN what are you prepared to do? If you open the can on these worms you must be prepared to go all the way. because they're not gonna give up the fight until one of you is dead."

 

Eliot Ness: "How do you do it then?"

 

Malone: "You wanna know how you do it? Here's how, they pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue! That's the Chicago way, and that's how you get Capone!"

 

 

Any comments? Continue the thread on the talk forum!

http://www.hockscombatforum.com

 

<<<>>>